Social Business, Google-China and Thomas Friedman
In a recent opinion piece in the New York Times, Thomas Friedman took a very provocative stance on the Google-China struggle, one that puts the free flow of information into a much broader context. Here’s the essence of what he had to say:
If China forces out Google, I’d like to short the Chinese Communist Party.
Where is he coming from? Well, like a lot of us, he see the command/control model of management giving way to the free flow of information and ideas fueled by networking and collaboration. There is a parallel here echoed by a diverse set of business leaders from John Chambers at Cisco to management guru, Gary Hamel.
Command/Control business management must give way to the power and potential of social business. By social business I include not just social networking on facebook but the deliberate collaboration and sharing that happens inside savvy companies and with a diverse set of external partners. This form of social business is fast and has less operational friction, but its real power comes from the innovation and agility to exploit new possibilities.
To make his point, Friedman quotes John Hagel
We are shifting from a world where the key source of strategic advantage was in protecting and extracting value from a given set of knowledge stocks — the sum total of what we know at any point in time, which is now depreciating at an accelerating pace — into a world in which the focus of value creation is effective participation in knowledge flows, which are constantly being renewed.
Finding ways to connect with people and institutions possessing new knowledge becomes increasingly important, says Hagel. Since there are far more smart people outside any one organization than inside.
Friedman says there are really two Chinese economies. Command China run by the Communist Party and Network China represented by the highly entrepreneurial sector that is exploiting the high-value flow of business knowledge. The former is a backward economy that can’t compete in today’s business climate (without the threat of force and control). The latter is represented by companies like Li & Fung, a $14 billion apparel company with a network of 10,000 specialized business partners where the daily flow of information leads to design and product innovation, leading-edge supply-chain management all fueled by the best global experts.
Friedman and Hagel both take positions that should not be taken lightly. For my part, I encourage people to back away from the trendy topics like Social CRM, Enterprise 2.0, collaboration and think about how the social dynamics they represent – open sharing, collaboration, collective intelligence and engaged participation – can help businesses thrive amidst the business dynamics of 2010. Command/Control worked well when the challenges were efficiency and stability.
4 Responses to “Social Business, Google-China and Thomas Friedman”
Leave a Reply






4q4ar4 ekrbfbkrafyq, [url=http://bbpscdideovp.com/]bbpscdideovp[/url], [link=http://rydbhoncsohs.com/]rydbhoncsohs[/link], http://xuylynsytenp.com/
Hi there, I found your blog via Google while searching for first aid for a heart attack and your post looks very interesting for me.
Valuable information and excellent design you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up!
deer viagra
subaction showcomments viagra start from online
cialis viagra heartburn
uk generic viagra
mark martin 1 18 viagra
viagra online consultation
can young people take viagra
effects of viagra mixed with cocaine
viagra lavetra cialis
benefits of viagra
viagra free order
fre viagra
singapore cailis viagra
photo reuters viagra odd argentine
viagra films
sildenafil vertigo
making the most of viagra
ditropan viagra
average cost of viagra
synthesis of sildenafil citrate
zenegra how to make sildenafil
viagra and pulmonary fibrosis
viagra photo
viagra every day
viagra banned from the olympics
viagra afghanies
free trial viagra online